The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to point out lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited gaming in a New york city suit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure clients with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, planes and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never quit.'

The inconsistency between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social gambling establishments offer clients a chance to play casino-style video games with buddies. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, however can be utilized to unlock numerous features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing customers to obtain other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement showing off Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require normally require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, therefore providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to pay for an opportunity to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference between social sweeps and standard online gambling websites like gambling establishments.'

Consider the method that McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of everyday businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-lived marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing clients the chance to play casino-style video games for real rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over claims of prohibited gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to deal with similar examination.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are forgoing significant tax and profits opportunities as this sports betting changes that carried out through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most current suit, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gaming business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's request for remark.

'We normally don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games across most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not only terrific video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to intensely protect any claim which may be brought against us.'

The problems between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position against unlawful gambling - especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting supposedly prohibited sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their star endorsers have an obligation to discuss to customers the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton